It isn’t a
subgenre of cinema with household name recognition or Tarantino-plagiarism-fanboy-adoration,
but the crime thrillers — or krimis — produced by German film studios like
Rialto, CCC and Constantin from the late 1950s through the early 1970s,
provided a lot of cinematic style markers for other, more popular genre film
staples to come. Yes they themselves borrowed from film noir and horror films
that came before them, but repurposed those tropes with a heightened brutality
and arguably, a sense of visual weirdness that makes even some of the more
pedestrian entries cinematically captivating.
For whatever
reason, as Germany tried to move out from the grim shadows of the second World
War, their movie-going public flocked to envelope themselves in other, pulpier
ones. Perhaps that‘s an adept reflection of the public consciousness at the
time: the desire to forget paired with the inability to shake the horror. And
if you can’t shake the horror, perhaps the next best thing is dressing it up as
something ridiculous that can be thwarted by a surrogate sense of justice
(often but not always portrayed by Joachim Fuchberger) within a 90 minute
running time. Many, but not all of the films are based on the fiction of
authors Edgar Wallace – the prolific English author who wrote the first draft
of the screenplay for Willis O’Brien’s King Kong, and his son Bryan
Edgar Wallace. If you’ve read any Edgar Wallace, you know his stories are
generally highly convoluted crime thrillers which, honestly, can be light on
the thrill quotient. I can say this as someone with a fair amount of Wallace on
my bookshelves. Why did Wallace strike such a chord in 1960s Germany? Did
setting the films in England simply broaden their export appeal, or was there
some other reason? Like Dennis Wheatley’s resurgence in Flower Power-generation London, it
causes one to scratch at the noggin, but I’m sure there were multiple
converging factors. And as the ‘60s progressed and the films continued to be churned
out, the surname Wallace went from being a byline to a concept at some point,
as Edgar Wallace became a brand that films not even based on his works would
have tacked on by producers as a selling point.
![]() |
| American lobby card for The Phantom Of Soho (1964), an image I first saw in the book "A Pictorial History Of Horror Movies", by Denis Gifford. |
For the
unfamiliar, Krimi films, in short, are usually whodunnit-style murder
mysteries with some unknown serial killer, usually with an unusual
supervillain-like name such as The Frog, The Tortoise, The Phantom, The Hexer,
The Avenger, etcetera, accruing a hefty body count, sometimes by some bizarre
or arcane method, sometimes not, while either a detective inspector from
Scotland Yard, or some wealthy playboy who fancies himself a detective, races
against time to unmask and apprehend them. When I say mask, I mean that
literally, since the baddies in these pictures generally dress more like
they’re going to square off with the Fantastic Four, than some nondescript
police inspector. This isn’t a new conceit by any measure, since Old Dark House
cheapy thrillers (The Old Dark House and The Cat And The Canary
perhaps being the most popular examples) and mysterious-killer-on-the-loose
serials from the 1930s, inspired by masked euro-criminals like Fantomas, some
even based on Edgar Wallace novels, like The Green Archer, already had
that template established.
Plot-wise, many
of the films fall somewhere between Robert Aldrich’s Kiss Me Deadly and
William Dozier’s Batman. That sounds absurd but I assure you it is accurate. The
films are generally set either in a moody London—full of sleazy waterfront
dives, shifty secret societies whose ranks are largely populated by the upper
echelons of nobility, smokey strip clubs and sketchy boarding houses, or some
sequestered country estate—largely gone to Gothic ruins but haunted by some
murderous specter who seems to be looking for something and willing to kill
anyone who stumbles into his path.
![]() |
| Another costumed baddie, with the somewhat unthreatening appelation of The Frog, from The Fellowship Of The Frog (1959). |
I was first made aware of these movies in the 1990s, when I started to receive Sinister Cinema and Something Weird catalogs in the mail. Why, I’ve never known. Perhaps they purloined order lists containing the names of people who’d held subscriptions to MAD Magazine and Conan The Adventurer comics. Maybe there was something in the ether that just told them that I snagged the TV Guide when it arrived in the mail each week and sifted through the nonsense to look for anything that mentioned Boris Karloff or Vincent Price, any old science-fiction or monster movie that might be lurking in the otherwise banal programming schedule.
When I first got
my hands on these sensational titles from these oddball German directors, with
names like The Mad Executioners, The Phantom Of Soho, The
Strangler Of Blackmoor Castle, I was taken aback by the oddball German
expressionist set dressing, the blunt-for-its-time gore, the often amazing
soundtracks accompanying them and, most importantly, the whole reason I’m
bothering to type this already long-winded diatribe, the seemingly random and
unconventional camera angles and perspectives used.
Now isn’t the
time to go into the amazing early electronic soundtrack Oskar Sala created for The
Strangler Of Blackmoor Castle, or the amazing mod-jazz grooves that
composers like Nora Orlandi, Martin Böttcher and Peter Thomas made for many of
the others, but I would like to spend a little time praising the off the wall
visual perspective used in these films.
There I was,
sitting through an honestly somewhat plodding remake of The Dead Eyes Of
London (1961), starring Klaus Kinski and Joachim Fuschberger. A soon-to-be
dead character goes to his bathroom to brush his teeth. Not much to get excited
about, but BAM, out of nowhere, as the victim-in-question goes to spritz his
mouth with mouthwash, we’re treated to a mouth’s-eye view of the task! Hold on,
what? Where the hell did that come from? Same thing with a scene near the end
of Der Hexer (1964), a movie that already has mini submersibles, secret
passages, scantily clad frauleins and a mysterious assassin. Our main
villain goes to make another of several phone calls in the film, when all of
the sudden we’re treated to a perspective shot from inside the dial on the
rotary phone.
![]() |
| A glimpse inside a soon-to-be victim's mouth, in The Dead Eyes Of London (1961). |
Honestly it’s this sense of visual quirkiness as much as the odd pulp fiction flamboyancy, that kept me trying to get my mitts on these titles to see what oddball art direction or photography choice would pop up.
![]() |
| A phone's eye view of the villain from Der Hexer, (1964) |
Obviously these krimi
films aren’t the only pictures to have ever used atypical perspective like
this, but I’ve yet to see any that others which did, that used it so
effectively. Like I said, outside of niche film enthusiasts or 1960s Late Late
Show devotees (where many Americans might have seen these pictures in dubbed
form), these types of movies are largely forgotten. But their thumbprint is
definitely on the secret agent/spy films they shared the box office with (both in content and soundtrack), the stylish
Italian giallo films that came shortly after (I find it hard to believe some of
these German directors like Alfred Vohrer weren’t taking style notes from Mario
Bava and Antonio Margheriti, and vice-versa), and even American slasher films of the 1980s.
![]() |
| The skull-faced killer in 1968's The Hand Of Power uses a scoprion-shaped ring with retractable tail dipped in poison as his weapon of choice. |
Many of these titles are available in dubbed form on a number of streaming services, some have been released in remastered form on DVD, primarily for the German market. Dubbed 16mm prints are available still through Sinister Cinema.





.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment