Showing posts with label sculpture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sculpture. Show all posts

Sunday, July 3, 2022

Eye On Art: Alexander Archipenko

 He was born in Kyiv, Ukraine in 1887, but his pursuit of art took him to Moscow, Paris, and eventually New York, where he was interred in Woodlawn Cemetery, in the Bronx, when he passed in 1964. Archipenko is credited as having been the first to apply Cubist principles to architecture and the creator of "sculpto-paintings", which are pieces that combine 2-D painted art with 3-D sculptural components on a canvas. 

"Médrano II" 1913-14. Painted tin,
wood, glass and painted oil cloth.


My introduction to Archipenko was entirely incidental. I had biked over to my local library and was looking at a book on Cubism, hoping to find some spark of inspiration that might ignite the pilot light of my imagination and result in a sketchbookin' session. I don't recall the exact title of the book, or its author–not that it's entirely important here–but on a page amongst some quarter-page reproductions of Fernand Léger's and a couple of Braques, was this tiny black and white picture of an Archipenko sculpture. It was this tiny, Post-It note-sized reproduction of Médrano II (1913). It stuck out like a neon sign. As much as I adore Léger's cartoonish pop color compositions, and Braque's broken-mirror-reflection building scapes, this tiny little insert photo was able to draw my eye away from the featured stars and put a bug of determination in my brain that buzzed to know more about this artist and his work.

"Femme assise" 1920. Gouache on paper.

"Femme Marchante" 1912. Sculpture in bronze.

There's a certain dynamism in Archipenko's pieces that vibrates with an aesthetic resonance in tune with those to whom Mid-Century abstraction appeals. Archipenko's work not only encapsulates everything that I find appealing about Cubism, both in form and principle, but also, as stationary, inanimate objects, his sculptures seem to resonate with a frenetic energy that other Cubist sculptors like Joseph Csaky and Jacques Lipchitz don't. I'm not disparaging either of those artists, Lipchitz's series of angular figures Le Guitariste (1918), Pierrot (1919), Harlequin With Clarinet (1919-20) and Man With Guitar (1920) would be tempting purchases if money were not an issue; but speaking subjectively, it's the negative space that Archipenko incorporates into his forms that create a sense of movement. He commented on this practice by saying:

"Traditionally there was a belief that sculpture begins where material touches space. Thus space was understood as a kind of frame around the mass... Ignoring this tradition, I experimented using the reverse idea, and concluded that sculpture may begin where space is encircled by the material." 


"In The Boudoir" 1915. Oil, graphite, photograph,
metal and wood on panel.



"Der Tanz" 1912. Sculpture in plaster.

"Carrousel Pierrot" 1913. Painted plaster.

"Venus" 1954.

"Red" 1957.

"Torso In Space" 1952-53. Lithograph, screenprint and embossing on paper.

Obviously this is just a taste of Archipenko's prolific output. Some of the pictures above were gleaned from Archipenko.org, which is an amazing resource that breaks down his life by decade and allows one to really see how his process changes, how his work progresses. It's definitely recommended to dip your toe into, even if you just want more eye candy.


Thursday, November 28, 2019

Giving Thanks: Breakfast With Ghosts

A dapper young skeleton
The first weekend in November I travelled back to Winona for a couple of reasons–one, to take my grandmother out to lunch and catch up with her;  two, to visit the Prairie Moon Sculpture Garden in Cochrane; and three, to attend my friend Kathy's Dia de los muertos celebration. 

It was great to spend time with my grandmother and catch up, I don't get to do it as often as I like, nor engage in it as often as I should. The Prairie Moon Sculpture Garden was fun; it's one of those weird slices of roadside Americana that people either find curiously fun in a kitschy way or wrinkle their brows at ask "Why?" while driving by. I'm ashamed to say I'd lived mere minutes away from it for nearly two decades, and it took two more after that to realize the place was there and coordinate a visit to it. Well, it's one of those weird slices of Americana that I find intriguing and see less as a quirky roadside road trip footnote, and more as a shrine to outsider folk art. Some of the pieces were in poor shape, particularly the coral snake, but it was a delightful shrine to one retired farmer's artistic vision. 



It's pretty impressive actually, and ballsy when you think about it. Here was Herman Rusch, a farmer, son of Prussian immigrants, who decided to keep the boredom of retirement at bey by building these bizarre concrete sculptures and having his friends make concrete sculptures of dinosaurs and animals and even a man knife-fighting a bear! In the rural farmland of Cochrane/Fountain City and the Coulee Region, that's the sort of eccentricity that would tend to serve as a red flag for Jeb and Skeeter to think maybe you ain't the way you oughta be, but hope the judicious application of work boots to head might properly recalibrate. Probably to the tune of "We don't do that 'round here." I know, I grew up in the area. Not that it's solely a haven for backwoods ignorants and Trump voters (nor am I suggesting everyone who lives in the woods is ignorant, lord knows I'm itching to join you), but casually suggest to a Cal or Rick working mandatory overtime at one of the factories keeping the town afloat that you don't eat meat, and to this day there's a bit of a straightening of the neck and a looking-down-the-cheekbone "You don't say" sort of response. But he had a yen to do this out of the ordinary thing and did it!


Here (above) is a video that gives a little detail about Rusch and his legacy. 



Later that evening I attended a wonderful Day of the Dead celebration organized and hosted by my friends Kathy VanCor and Brandon Rustke. I even got to operate the piñata! It was a great time and a call to remember and celebrate the lives that may have left us with little but memories in their wake. In fact the idea struck home hard enough to inspire me to visit my grandparents early Sunday morning. 

I hadn't been to Oakland Cemetery in Stockton since my grandfather was interred there, the day before Thanksgiving 2010. It's a small, unassuming collection of headstones; definitely a country graveyard, and it suits him to a T (though I'm still not sure what that idiom means, really). It's quiet, rural, surrounded by farmland and rolling bluffs, and, as in life, has a set of train tracks running right next to his home. 


It's a bit hard to see but Ralph has a fish jumping out of the water near his name. He loved fishing.

 The road into Oakland Cemetery is a dirt and gravel road, accessed across a field. The land where the cemetery rests is butted right up against Garvin Brook, and faces a wide stretch of Stockton valley in the other direction, a panoramic view of the humpbacked bluffs and all their various color changes throughout the year. Ralph always was an outdoors kind of person who loved country music and professional wrestling. He loved being outdoors and watching the birds and squirrels. He gets the quiet of a country graveyard now, the trickling current of the brook behind him, the direct sun above him, and all the wildlife the area has to offer. 




A few other Haedtkes are resting in Oakland as well, including my
great-grandparents.



That morning I also visited my paternal grandparents in the certainly more "metropolitan" St. Mary's Cemetery, which is in Winona proper, right next to the armory (where my senior prom was held). It's a sprawling, multi-tiered cemetery on the town's east side, not far from where my grandparents lived, actually. Bob and JoAnn lived in an amazing mid-century split-level on East Lake Boulevard, a house that I had decided I was going to own one day when my grandparents either moved into a retirement community or, god forbid, passed on. That didn't happen for a number of reasons, but it was an amazing place with some choice mid-century decor and an amazing finished basement. It sat on a hill at the foot of the bluffs, right below Sugarloaf, and overlooked the twin lakes. But I digress. 



Bob and JoAnn's headstone suits them as well. Quiet, polished, with a classic
sensibility that ties some mid-century modernism with traditionalism.

Something struck me while I was out walking around these tombstones that frosty morning. John Waters once said something (I'm paraphrasing here) about how people's homes should be filled with all kinds of "weird art" and wall colors that reflect their personalities, rather than something just picked up at Sears, hung on the ever-present off-white or beige walls. But people largely don't. I've been in a lot of homes and I see a lot of off-white and beige walls with the same Terry Redlin prints and hotel-friendly abstract art picked up at Home Goods or something. That's fine, if that's what you like, but a home, the place where someone would hopefully go to decompress and remove the normalcy filters they need to put on while out in the general public, should ultimately reflect the person living in it, right?

The same goes with tombstones. Now, I know there's more than desire and personal vision that goes into the choosing of a tombstone. For example, there's cost. Expense is prohibitive for a lot of people, myself included, when it comes to making decisions on anything. I see a lot of old headstones that are just sometimes-smoothed blocks of stone with a name chiseled into it. Then there are the obviously wealthy folks who have the massive stone angels and the large sepulchers. But as I toed my way around the headstones at St. Mary's, I saw all of these amazing headstones that reflected some aspect of the individual they stood sentinel over.


For example, this headstone with the image of Elvis and a flying monkey on it. What the hell is that all about? I want to know more about these people and why this was chosen as the imagery best to reflect the memory of their presence on Earth? It's fantastic!


Or how about this die-cut marker with the etched portrait in front of a palm tree in the setting sun? Winona, Minnesota is diametrically opposed to a tropical seascape sunset in so many ways, why was this chosen to be what this woman will be forever memorialized with? 

Or this stand up bass iconography I saw in Oakland near my grandfather:




Personally, I'm not sure I even want to be buried. I don't know, maybe cremation is the way to go. I haven't really given it much thought. There are days when it seems like a high dive off of a bridge might be the best route to take. But the trip to the cemeteries was cathartic and necessary; it had been a while since I had a chance to sit and talk to my relatives and just say hello, even if it was a one-sided conversation. It's really more of a balm for the psyche than anything else, I suppose, helping you feel like that connection is still there even if they aren't. Like Herman Rusch we all kind of want to leave something to be remembered by after we're gone, whether that's a kind impression on the people we love and hope love us back, or a concrete replica of our features, sternly watching over what we had the audacity to dare to build in life. It's a good reminder to appreciate the people that flavor our lives in a positive way, and restrict the time given to those who do not. There are a lot of things to be thankful for, whether hidden in the minutiae of our daily struggles and pursuits, obscured by the folds of frustration, or sitting in plain sight. There's nothing wrong with being happy, and pursuing that happiness by being yourself and reveling in your own interests, even if there's a lot of unhappy people who would like to take that away from you. 

As mach as it sounds like off the cuff, platitudinous pablum, be yourself and be kind. Appreciation is one of the best gifts you can give to someone, and a little goes a long way.


For clarification, I'm on the right.


Carry on you wayward spirits.